Four venues out of 990: how Arts Council England left grassroots music to fend for itself
Only four music venues sit in Arts Council England's 990-strong portfolio. Where the grassroots money went, what it actually paid for, and where it should go next.
Four venues. Out of 990.
Arts Council England's national portfolio has 990 organisations in it. Four are music venues. Six are talent development organisations. That's the problem in one line. Grassroots music gets praised as culture in every speech, then treated like a side quest when the grants are handed out.
Meanwhile, the gig week carries on regardless. At the time of writing, New Cross Inn in London had Ratsalad on the bill, Netil360 in Stoke Newington was hosting Tuesday Jazz Club, and CHALK in Brighton had La Dispute. Over at Komedia in Bath, the venue's own evaluation shows what a grassroots room really does: comedy, club nights, music, cabaret, 400-plus events a year, all crammed into one building. That's the scene. Messy, local, alive. The funding picture looks nothing like it.
Where the retreat shows up
ACE hasn't vanished from live music. It has stepped back from being its obvious home. The Commons Culture, Media and Sport Committee set out two recent public measures. First, £500,000 from ACE to help Music Venue Trust buy the freehold of at-risk venues. Second, the ACE-administered Supporting Grassroots Music Fund, set at £4 million per year across two years for venues, festivals, rehearsal and recording spaces, electronic music venues and independent promoters. The Government then said it would add £5 million over 2023-25, and later extended the fund into 2025-26.
Tidy on paper. Patchy on the ground. The committee was blunt that ACE itself accepted its investment cannot fix all these problems. Hold on to that line next time you hear official talk about support. There is support, yes. There is also an awful lot of scene left to fend for itself.
And the scene doesn't fit one neat category. Komedia isn't only a gig room. It's a community-owned building with a second 100-capacity space it wanted to kit out with PA and lighting so live shows would actually be viable. That's the practical, boring, essential spending the sector needs. Not glossy culture language. Working kit. Better sound. A room you can use.
The real loss is in the admin gap
Grassroots nightlife spaces have always been hopeless at fitting into neat funding boxes. Arts Professional notes that these venues often get dismissed as hospitality or leisure rather than culture, and it stings because it's accurate. A club night is not a cocktail bar with speakers. A 150-cap room where a band starts at 10pm and a DJ carries the rest of the night is part of the live music ecosystem. Yet the forms, the criteria and the hours it takes to fill them in can shut smaller places out before they start.
This is where the retreat bites hardest. Not only in the headline sums, but in a process that expects underpaid teams to behave like grant specialists. The DIY promoter, the local venue manager, the rehearsal studio owner: they're already doing load-in, door money, social posts, curfew wrangling and the finance run. Stack a complicated funding application on top and you've built a wall, not a ladder.
The Arts Council's own Supporting Grassroots Live Music evaluation makes it plain. Among respondents, 66% said the fund had been a lifeline for grassroots music promoters and or venues. Among award holders, that rose to 94%. That's not a decorative stat. Direct support changes how a room gets through the month, not just how it looks in a report.
What the money actually bought
The best example in the evaluation is also the most ordinary one. Komedia wanted to turn its second space into a 100-cap live room and applied for money towards PA and lighting. Before that, it only had a vocal PA and minimal stage lighting, so putting on live music was too expensive because extra gear had to be hired in every time. This is exactly what grassroots funding should exist for. Not abstract development plans. Cables, boxes, lights, acoustic common sense.
Same logic across the circuit. The new Supporting Grassroots Music fund is meant to reach recording studios, rehearsal studios, promoters, festivals, and live and electronic venues. Good. It should. The trouble is scale and continuity. A one-off grant buys time. It doesn't fix the wider drain of rising costs, staffing pressure and thin margins that keeps shoving smaller venues towards the edge.
And the people using these spaces aren't waiting for policy to catch up. They buy tickets for a local show on Thursday, pile into a club night on Friday, then go back on Monday to rehearse. The ecosystem is the audience, the band, the promoter, the sound tech and the venue team all at once. Knock out one part and the whole loop gets weaker.
Send the money closer to the rooms
The cleanest route is local, not central. Arts Professional picks up the sector's long-running push for cultural devolution, with funding routed through local authorities and Mayoral Strategic Authorities instead of everything going through ACE. The new Creative Growth Fund is set at £150 million over three years for six MSAs, with room for tailored interventions for grassroots venues and emerging artists in each region. Right direction. Manchester doesn't need the same fix as Carlisle, and London doesn't need the same fix as Bath.
Grassroots music funding should do three things:
- pay for the practical stuff that keeps rooms open: sound, lights, basic infrastructure;
- back promoters, rehearsal spaces and club nights, not only headline gig venues;
- move faster, with applications a small team can finish without hiring outside help.
Short version: keep the money near the rooms that use it. Keep the criteria broad enough to catch clubs, electronic venues and mixed-use spaces. And stop treating a grassroots venue as a luxury add-on to culture. It's where the night starts, and sometimes it's where a whole scene survives.
If you're in the room, not in Westminster
Gig-goer, clubber or promoter, this hits you directly. The venue you love might be one rent rise from losing its second room. The free entry night that builds a local scene might disappear because nobody had time to write a strong application. The rehearsal space that feeds three bands could quietly shut while bigger institutions keep talking about access.
So watch who actually gets the grants. See if your local authority or mayoral body takes culture seriously or just folds it into tourism chat. Ask venues what equipment, staffing or building work they need most. If they say PA, lighting, insulation, a new bar system or a room divider, that's the real list. Not a slogan.
Then keep backing the places already doing the work. Buy the ticket for the Tuesday jazz set at Netil360. Go to the free day party in Manchester. Catch the open mic in Chelmsford or the late club night in London. Funding helps. A crowd is what keeps the doors open.
Sources
- Arts Professional - Sector Plan contains promising signs for grassroots music
- Culture in Our City - Supporting Grassroots Music - Arts Council England Funding
- Culture, Media and Sport Committee - Grassroots music venues
- Culture, Media and Sport Committee - Grassroots music venues: Government response
- Arts Council - Supporting Grassroots Live Music Evaluation report